AI Security Roles Are Undefined
Teams know they need AI security, but they cannot define the work, roles, skills, or hiring profile.
Buyer fear
We cannot build the program because we cannot define the people or responsibilities.
Primary service
AI Governance & Security Program Build
Supporting services
Best for
Why This Matters
The business and security pressure.
If you cannot define the work, you cannot hire, train, or measure the team.
Review Surfaces
Systems and surfaces in scope.
Listed surfaces are common review targets, not partnership, certification, or endorsement claims. Marketplace readiness support does not replace official review.
Common Failure Modes
What usually breaks.
A team knows the title but not the work
Roles are borrowed from AppSec without AI specifics
Hiring requests are vague
Training does not match the operating model
What We Do
The work mapped to the service path.
Define AI security roles, operating model, skills matrix, hiring requirements, training paths, team responsibilities, and workforce development plans
Separate AppSec, platform, governance, sales engineering, and product responsibilities
Use Academy paths to validate the plan
Make the program hireable and teachable
Workbench Instruments
Products used to deliver or demonstrate the work.
Deliverables Produced
Artifacts buyers can inspect.
AI Security Role Blueprint
Skills Matrix
Hiring Rubric
Team Responsibility Map
Training Pathway Plan
What Good Looks Like
Concrete outcomes.
Roles are explicit
Responsibilities are separated
Hiring rubrics are usable
Training paths match the operating model
Related services
Related research
Caveat
Based on analyzed job-description signals and scoped engagement evidence, not proof of any individual company's internal security maturity.
Turn this brief into scoped work.
The CTA follows the primary service path so the next step is commercially clear.